Wall Park - Citizens workshop failed: called for fundamental reform of the citizen survey and building and planning law! because the residents of
initiative Marthashof in the so-called civil parking garage wall expatriates identify with the meaning of BI
Carambolage also part of the citizen initiatives
network BIN Berlin fully can we allow this explanation public. We regret that the
Gothenburg workshop 21 degraded instrument, could not take the opportunity to bring to a successful conclusion and now quasi mutates into a zombie Werkstatt21, is that yesterday is to realize projected on the wall plans: concrete towers on the
Eckspielplatz , possibly exhaust for the children of the school on the wall outside
Park next to the access road, and in the north a nightmare chain of
FIVE Martha courts of the so-called:
MEGA MARTHASHOF thank Mrs. Ch quarter from the well for pointing this out..
· citizens and "Citizens' Workshop" reject the draft of the urban design competition and generally building the wall of parks. Citizens workshop therefore no realistic Prespektive
· perceptions of investors and citizens differ widely
· Carambolage calls citizen survey in the affected neighborhoods to the park wall
Heiner Geissler calls for a fundamental reform of the building and planning law!
(see below) Carambolage calls for two years the same ... For large projects such as Mauerpark21, Kastanienallee21, A100, but also for other important decisions that change the lives of citizens in their neighborhoods.
But politicians from the center of Berlin quickly learn the will of the citizens to absurdity or to run into space. alibi events, pseudo-public participation ("Select The color of the car that they do not want ") , citizen participation-THEATER. to visit News in and around the "citizen workshops" to Wall Park. Here may the "citizens workshop" as it were to decide whether you want to put the concrete in the Wall Park "green or gray" is.
Although the jury (occupied entirely by the owners and their collecting interests) met for the urban process, a vote was that the "citizens' workshop" rejects all around, remains the Panel continue to exist, and will tirelessly work . Continue But to what purpose? Which room to negotiate is to persist this slap in the face of an urban design here?
Vivico will not take back the draft and their agenda anyway remains the same: "Quantity is quality" - the more concrete is installed the better for the investors - logical. Anyone who has experienced some of the discussants on Monday could believe that the members of the Citizens' Workshop "(in which citizenship is not represented at all representative) and hope with them to the City Council Gothe invention invisible concrete.
It is welcome that the citizens of the fountain area and citizens from the Prenzlauer Berg have come closer, as was pointed out repeatedly from the citizens workshop. Those who are citizens of the workshop but is now resigned final've done this, because the METHOD illegitimate is not because they do not want a say. you do not want to have their say about how they "hung" are may be, but whether you ever "hung". Is not it crucial to understand this difference?
It does not prevent the citizens from the shop-worn and initiatives to citizens about a dialogue, but it to "eye level" ( Gei
ssler) to lead. As long as the citizen participation process imposes a mandatory building height of eye but can be no question.
Gothenburg City Council but fears the vote of a citizen survey. It would be similar as the vote of the citizens on the Gendarmenmarkt, which he describes itself as working wonders today. Do we want to a town council that has so little feel for the concerns of the citizens?
Mainz - Stuttgart-21
Heiner Schlichter Gei
ssler has called for a fundamental reform of the building and planning law. For large public projects, citizens should continue to start even the plans are included, said the CDU politicians on Friday in Mainz. Currently, they only listened to the end, when the decision on the projects already. People are no longer willing to offer this type of ' spectator democracy to accept
' . From the beginning of a major project there should be public discussion, asked Gei
ssler. If a conflict would ensue, should a mediation or arbitration to be initiated. All parties must at a table and they would have to meet as equals.
DAPD