Wall Park, Marthashof & Much More: SUNDAY the bathhouse and Berg BIN Berlin.org!
Friday, October 30, 2009
Writing Community Service Letters For Court
may seem so tiring this part, only in the perception of antisocial and antiökologschen planning will can win our resistance in the networked initiatives against the destructive power of form and impact - the only way we can in future venues such as the Wall Park, Chestnut Avenue, the Stadtbad Oderberger Street, Media Spree and wherever Bemächtigungswille this occurs, avoid this normative destructive power!
the riparian initiative Marthashof AIM will do their bit to the devastation of the Marthasofgeländes by the "tsunami of gentrification", both the Berlin authorities and federal policy, shoulder to shoulder responsibility with the investors have NEVER be forgotten, especially in that last link in the chain - the buyers of the real estate section of property, the actual
financiers of the devastation :
13/10/2009 - 18:00 financiers of the devastation :
presentation of the first results for the
plot Kastanienallee / Schönhauser Allee
in BVV room.
planning for land Kastanienallee 97-99/Schönhauser All 148
plot Kastanienallee / Schönhauser Allee
in BVV room.
planning for land Kastanienallee 97-99/Schönhauser All 148
The property is to be offered by the land used by the trustees for sale Berlin property fund. Currently it is still used as a public car park. The district council has decided on 13/05/2009 Pankow (VI-0703), that is to be placed before a development plan for the property. As a basis for the development plan were urban versions of Office staudt huber architects developed, which are presented here on the web. In a joint work meeting of the Property Fund, the District Office and representatives of the fractions of the five already BVV on 22/09/2009 developed alternative concepts presented and discussed. To deepen the variant were 5 "Puhlmannscher court" and, alternatively, the variant 1 "vistas" empfohlen.Die variants are presented on Oct 13, 2009 at 18:00 in clock BVV Hall, Froebel Street 17, House 7, presented to the public and discussion gestellt.Der including discussion of the results of selected design, is finally re-released on the Internet and serve as a basis for the development plan then the following procedure.
Pankow district of Berlin 
10 400 Berlin, Fröbelstraße 17 House 7, BVV Hall continuation of the 27th public meeting of the Borough Assembly of Pankow in Berlin
Occasion: continuation of the regular session
ULTRA main agenda: showing the flag!
Big Question
Group of the SPD to Marthashof:
questions to the District Office: 1st What basic and floor space ratio, the work has now Marthashof compared from the master plan? second In answering the question 0494/VI small indicated to the District Office to submit its position in relation to the real guarantee of publicly available and usable green space to a review. The District Office is now formed an opinion whether a real securities necessary? If so, have already begun discussions with the developer? If not, the district office is certain that a publicly accessible and usable green space will create real and what is the basis that security?
third Why the draft master plan was not publicly discussed with the local residents? Does the District Office considers that the affected local residents as the conception of "senior advisers" from the meeting, 21.11.2006, that a moderate, not so much the neighboring buildings shade buildings "not urban enough" is? 4th What conclusions does the District Office of the future from the recent expiration of the construction project Marthas court? Is it as future results of peer review to present and discuss urban planning and public?
Marthashof The project could have been an exemplary planning with public participation. Instead, the project is highly controversial, both in terms of the planning solution and in particular with regard to the policy of informing the public. Common ground seems to be that adopted the master plan is flawed. It is difficult to identify leaders. The big question will therefore be to the Enlightenment and thus contribute to the fact that not such a drain on other projects again.
Mauerpark finish, combine with green - instead of separated by development application the Left Party:
The BVV Pankow advocates that the Wall Park will be completed in its proposed location and size . A development of parts of the planned wall parking area with houses rejected the BVV Pankow. The BVV supports the commitment of the initiatives of citizens from the middle and Pankow for the completion of the park wall and against a wall construction of planned parks.
first The BVV asked the district office to help to ensure that the land use plan established planning objectives of Berlin for the development of a connected green coating on the surfaces of the former site of the freight depot of the Northern Railway between Bernauer Strasse and Gleim tunnel realized and the Wall Park in its proposed location and size be (competition result, design of Prof. Lange) completed. second The District Office is requested, the Senate of Berlin and the Berlin Mitte District this position to provide and coordinate a common approach to achieve this goal. third
The District Office is requested to support the commitment of citizens' initiatives for the completion of the Wall Park.
In recent weeks considerations from the district office center known as "compensation" for transfer of land to expand the existing wall parking area on parts of the previously earmarked for the completion of the Wall Park areas in the district center of the property owners planning permission for a massive residential development to give.
The Wall Park is planned as a green corridor, which offers on-site of the former division of the city joined a lively meeting place and recreation. A development with houses would thwart these projects and highlight passages, despite a new dividing line.
The Wall Park is today, although only half finished, a very heavily used recreational area in the middle of densely built neighborhoods that desperately need an increase, to maintain the usability and improve the future.
Given the already existing and further increasing density of residential development in this area would provide additional residential development on land to which this has so far ruled out building regulations, not in the public interest. Such additional, large-scale residential area countered the efforts of the district offices of central and Pankow, the ongoing infill in the surrounding residential areas to counteract construction law.
A residential development on the proposed Wall parking areas would not only deprive the much needed green space to the park, but to use because of inevitable conflicts between the residential use and the lively park usage, latter limit even further.
chestnut avenue in Prenzlauer Berg for the planning and public participation
Please take note of: In completion of the 20 in the Meeting of BVV on 10.12.2008 adopted
request from the Borough Assembly - Printed Matter VI-0522: "1 The BVV asked the district office, take into account when reviewing the planning of chestnut avenue to under point four aspects of this proposal put forward and the test results of both the Committee on Transport, public policy and consumer protection, and participation in civil present. second The implementation of the current draft planning does not automatically lead to an increase in traffic safety since a) the Chestnut Avenue is widened optical, which usually leads to an increase in the speed of road users and thus increases tendenhziell serious risk accidents b) the multi-purpose strip probably parked cars more frequently and is the bike rider then must auseichen in the reach of the tram, which increases the risk of accident or - as today - to hazards during the opening and closing of car doors comes c) the management of the supply strip over the area lead Haltestellenkaps tram to major conflicts and the risk of accidents between pedestrians and cyclists will d) of the pavement by the engagement of the parking bays become less usable space, is even today is in part recorded already over-exploitation, e) an integration the chestnut trees in a reasonable cycling system is missing and it is not anyway because of the tram line and the missing link in a northerly and southerly direction suitable for the exclusive bundling of cycling.
third Against this background, the District Office is requested to also examine development options that by widening the sidewalk to a reduction the roadway cross-section lead, allowing a change of space that can possibly lead to a shift away from the longitudinal Parking. These variants are also to discuss with the citizens' is reported pursuant to § 13 District Administration Act (BezVG).
Referring to the interim report of 24/02/2009 we inform you that the revised draft on the basis of citizen participation in planning the was meeting of the Committee on Transport, public policy and consumer protection confirmed from 12.05.2009 and submitted on time the appropriate planning document on 30.06.2009 at the Senate Department for Urban Development for consideration. We ask to see the finished printed matter in this context as. budgetary impact no equality and equal treatment-related effects no impact on sustainable development no omitted child and family compatibility
Matthias Köhler Jens-Holger Kirchner
here again the
overview of the most interesting meeting day, because, unfortunately, can not be operated with links, the BVV Information System turn out to be more than annoying Desinformationsssystem end. highlighted
we have all the points that fell into our eye:
Ö 1 complex 1
Ö 1.11 Selecting an adjunct member of the board of BVV Pankow in Berlin VI-0873
Ö 1:13 choice of an arbitrator for the arbitration District 1 - the difference in the district includes the hamlet of Book - in the district of Pankow VI-0857
Ö 1:14 election an arbitrator for the arbitration District 10 - the difference District includes the District of Weissensee - in the district of Pankow VI-0858
Ö 1:20
Marthashof VI-0871 Ö 1:21 make Mauerpark ready, combine with green - instead of separated by buildings VI-0867 Ö 1:25 release of blocked funds media procurement VI -0872 Ö Ö 2 complex 2 2.7 Protestant cemeteries along the Heinrich-Roller-Straße VI-0207 9.2 Ö development of cooperative site Eliashof
VI-0261 2:10 Ö dissolution of the district's facilities branch libraries Esmarchstr.18 (Kurt - Tucholsky Library ) and Senefelderstr. 6 (library Eliashof) VI-0310 Ö 2:11 Indoor pool Pankow: keep open door - Moratorium VI-0329 Ö 2.13 Further operating Kurt Tucholsky Library VI-0384 Ö 2:15 experience on Meeting request - places for all generations VI-0468 Ö 2:16 restoration objectives long-term planning law VI-0495
Ö 2:17 Environmental and Energy Park in the botanical public park VI-0520
Ö 2:18
Kastanienallee
in Prenzlauer Berg - suggestions for planning and public participation VI-0522
Ö 2:21 implementation of the gender policy framework program - Districts Master Plan VI -0572 Ö
2:23 rededication of the Children and Youth Cultural Centre Eliashof VI-0599
Ö 2:25 survey of compensation in the redevelopment areas and the use of use VI-0629
Ö 2:27 chance to improve the school meal VI-0679
Ö 2:29 insulation district owned buildings VI-0701
Ö 2:34 estate sports facility at the White Lake VI 0744
Ö 2:38 GA application for researchers Lock / LSC immediately and fully submit VI-0781
Ö 2:42 strategy change in budgetary policy VI-0819
Ö 2:43 timetable for urban planning for the
plot Schönhauser Allee 148/Kastanienallee 97 - 1999 VI-0825 2:44 Ö planning workshop to change the former Goods Station VI-0826 Ö 2:45 Cultural Ensemble at Thälmannpark - Design VI-0841 Ö 2:46 Joint music school site
Ö 2:48 draft budget for the cultural sector VI-0848 Ö 2:49 Privacy Concerns clarify create clarity: Finally security for the Kurt Tucholsky library! VI-0851 2:56
Ö preparing
Weissensee - Composers district Prenzlauer Berg - Winsstraße
our friends from CIRCLE INITIATIVE MEDIA SINK SPREE! AG Spreeufer point us to the fact that this event will take place in parallel to the BVV Pankow: the next date for the Special Committee Spree room is this Wed, d. 14.10. at 18:30 clock at City Hall, Yorckstraße 4-11 (BVV-hall) extremely critical to the agenda include: - is the district office "new" guidelines for all banks of the Spree from Kreuzberg - the SPD tries to submit an application for construction of the former. Dämmisolgrundstückes and a vote of the entire Spree bank on Köpenicker road to an exclusive residential location - the district office is a separate installation decision for the accelerated process of a new development plan for the Dämmisol-plot before of model citizen participation has been months, the speech - this threatens to the former. Dämmisolgelände after Mary-land burial of the next citizens' decision. We can not get that far! Please help! urban development differently: Spree for all!
the subject WALL PARK
that all of us are so fond, also because of the initially described Bemächtigungswille the most brutal and most visible in the plans of Vivico Real Estate and SPD-middle-Gothe shows indicates two references:
we learned
that on Monday dem19.10.2009 the Board of the Berlin House
the theme park is to wall in a large scale will be discussed and debated. This concerns all of us!
Therefore we certainly also in the large demonstration on Wednesday to see 25.11.2009 - Caution: remove the date bandied November 4:
Notify Me!
demonstration
the public meeting of the
Urban Development Committee the Borough Assembly Middle
on
Wed
the
25th November
2009,
19.30 clock
HOT AUTUMN
surely follow, perhaps it creates the
citizen initiatives Network Berlin surely follow, perhaps it creates the
soon publish even a collaborative calendar, so that all the activists and Berliners moving in the right place at the right time yet this can appear quite beautiful city!
PS: and just reached us yet this "
invitation to 1.Bürgerabend on 20/10/2009 " we like to distribute - thanks Jochen: Hi, civil society all interested citizens and residents of the city invites Luis 1 Citizens evening to urban development planning in the city Luis (INSEK) a. The public transport company of the civil society ( http://www.buergerverein- luisenstadt.de/berlin/ags- projects / verkehr.php ) and residents initiative Angel Gardens ( www.engelkiez.de ) therefore call all interested people in the neighborhood on to come to this first public presentation of the planning of the Gothenburg city architect responsible planning agencies Herwarth + wood and the interests of the residents in the Luis city to articulate clearly. us, it goes together to preserve or even expand existing "green" infrastructure (planned Luisenstädtischer church park development along the old James Street, Wall Strip Sebastian Street, Garden City of Berolina along Anne Street, Märkisches Museum, where possibly at the Brazilian Embassy Green space is to be built), and other areas of Luis town, where under the INSEK planning additional development and consolidation is imminent. We also sat down together for measures to reduce through traffic (Engeldamm, Legien and Leuschnerdamm, Anne Street, Old James Street, etc.) and for new pedestrian crossings and a Fahhradangebotsstreifen. We are consistently a reduction of car speed, road speed as Anne 30th We are against opening up the existing dead-ends at the Berlin Wall (Dresden Road, Sebastian Road, Alexandria road, etc., there is strong pressure from the for Construction and the plan works Downtown pioneer Hoffmannn-Axthelm, Luis city "to the center to traffic and transportation to "Open, which means that traffic from the Leipziger Strasse, the street cooking area and be managed by the addition of Spittelmarkt by Luis city). We are opposed to further privatization of public Land demand and a strengthening of public infrastructure in the district (playgrounds, schools, daycare centers, etc.) Please spread the invitation of the Civil Association for the event on to potentially interested and affected parties who are not in my mailing list. best regards, Jochen Baumann the event will be held on 20.10.2009 18-20 clock in the St. Michael's Church Waldemar 8-10 in Berlin-Kreuzberg.
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Bushnell 3200 Elite Tactical Cant Zero
Marthashof Wall Park Media Spree in the hot autumn
tomorrow is election day in Germany! so hide, we do not, what have
tomorrow is election day in Germany! so hide, we do not, what have
direct Andi data in Berlin-Mitte
used their chance, that of the citizen initiatives network BIN Berlin.org, the initiative fertigstellen.de Wall Park, and the AnliegerInitiatve Marthashof.org compiled questions
(subject was: to answer
PIECE CANDIDATE SURVEY)
, and so explain to the voters even better.
which have taken this trouble, many thanks, - in particular the links that could bring themselves to a joint statement the two candidates of the concerned Write to Mitte and Pankow!
burn the urban policy issues as under the nails that will be at the next election even more Berliners affected: we will remember it because of what was on these issues in September 2009 found no answers.
we want to mention especially Dr. Eva Högl in the SPD. that the companion of Mrs Junge-Reyer, Mr Wowereit, Mr Gothe and Mr. Wieland / Wedding would come with each statement in a considerable dilemma similar predicament is clear: "
si tacuisses, philosophus
for now we are there to remind constantly to and fetch another reminder.
, a word to represent the other major People's Party in Mitte, Dr. Christian Burholt of the CDU: the company car color-stricken, past night by Harald Schmidt intimate as ignorant
family policy details exposed -
wanted to make it, especially as now
some evil-meaning even doubt whether Dr.
Burholt can ever spell gentrifickation
"Pack your things and
it go please," cried the other of the too a good choice
Jörg Schleicher
--------------------------- ------------------------------------------
as a direct candidate in the constituency 076 Berlin-Mitte you is certainly aware that in old center and Wedding, belonging to that constituency, but also in neighboring Prenzlauer Berg, and now also in the whole of Berlin and also discussed the plans of the District for Construction of the center Mr. Ephraim Gothe and Vivico Real Estate for construction of the Wall Park extremely controversial, especially in connection with the construction plans at Bernauer Strasse.
We at the Citizens' Initiatives Network BIN Berlin Wall and the Initiative Park Finish now think that the voters in the district center of your political position should know about this subject, so we allow ourselves to you the following questions:
first have How are the plans for construction of the Wall Park as the center for Construction of the district, Mr Ephraim Gothe and Vivico Real Estate presented in this study plan
neuergothe_plan.jpg and how them on 4 November 2009, Committee on Urban Affairs of the District Assembly of the middle to be presented?
the plan, I never knew before. I'm shocked! I think that you could park in the wall some by planting beautiful. Its recreational value could be increased. It is to become the front yard for the rich but little else. All the opportunities that are REALLY worth and growth for our city to be lost by narrow financial interests cell.
second
How do you want general information about the problem of urban density, as in a particularly crass
How do you want general information about the problem of urban density, as in a particularly crass
(Note: This question is not "open"!)
way for the construction projects Marthashof and chestnut orchards in the Schwedt street, and in the planned nine-story continuous development along the Bernauer Strasse, thus indicates the border between the districts of Prenzlauer Berg and Mitte?
Kastaniengärten Marthashof
marthashofblog: Marthashof-claustrophobia under German roofs
Zoning Process / Senate Department for Urban Development Berlin
Since we have duch the old building of the wall such beautiful open spaces in the city - now they are replaced by new walls.
http://fuer-grundeinkommen.de/ berlin-mitte.htm Jörg Schleicher
see how the social consequences of this compression, in particular with regard to concepts such as gentrification and development?
It is so sad: Hardly a neighborhood is nice, because nice people there have created visionary, he is overwhelmed by financial interests. The Marthashof seems a heinous Concoction to be. To put the residents surrounding these blocks before the doors and windows, I find just a social. A "price increase" the area may take place by - a "revaluation" of the area takes place by any means.
layer: surface sealing!
assess how the environmental consequences of these surface sealing?
layer: surface sealing!
third such problems often go for privatization of public Property ahead: should there be in the decision on privatization of public property, citizens can participate, ABSOLUTELY YES! and how it should be designed, where appropriate? through genuinely free, independently moderated - discussions. S.
http://fuer-grundeinkommen.de/
about answering our questions as soon as possible by e-mail (please also contact @ mauerpark- fertigstellen.de
of the riparian initiative Marthashof for BIN Berlin.org and Wall Park Fertigstellen.de
LG, Ralph
-------------------------------- ------------------------------------- second Dr. Klaus Lederer / Stefan L iebich, common response of the direct candidate for the constituency of 76 (middle) and 77 (Pankow), THE LEFT
Ladies and Gentlemen, Dear residents Initiative Marthashof,
below I am sending you the common response of the direct candidate for the constituency of 76 (middle) and 77 (Pankow), Klaus Lederer and Stefan Liebich.
* 1 * How do you feel about the plans for construction of the Wall Park as the center for Construction of the district, Mr Ephraim Gothe and Vivico Real Estate have presented in this study plan neuergothe_plan.jpg
fertigstellen.de / images /
below I am sending you the common response of the direct candidate for the constituency of 76 (middle) and 77 (Pankow), Klaus Lederer and Stefan Liebich.
http://mauerpark-
fertigstellen.de / images /
neuergothe_plan.jpg
> and how on 4 November 2009, Committee on Urban development of the Borough Assembly center will be presented?
I refuse to the new plans, Mr Gothe with Vivico GmbH for construction of the planned completion for the Wall Park site has agreed, from. Stefan Liebich, direct candidate of the left for the neighboring constituency in the district of Pankow, and I have a statement which I enclose to you, our position, the position of the left Berlin explained. If Gothe and the Berlin city development administration with Vivico want to swap land with building rights, then the municipal action to marketable commodity exchange. The state of Berlin and the districts Middle and Pankow must implement to define the public interest and goals and then those with the appropriate legal means. In this green land use plan as the goal of community is shown. Politicians of all parties had expressed in recent years that you want to make the Wall Park finished. Gothenburg City Council except no one has previously stated that the building would be new residential blocks instead of the Wall Park is a public interest. Gothenburg and the urban management task of the public have to implement the goals or bring about a new policy objective by amending the policy position. The collecting interests of the property owner can not be relevant. Rather than provide housing, should submit a Gothe B-Plan, which identifies the business park as green space.
* 2 * What is your general on the problem of urban density, as in a particularly crass way for the construction projects Marthashof and chestnut orchards in the Schwedt road, as well as the proposed 9-storey continuous development at Bernauer Strasse, thus indicates the border between the districts of Prenzlauer Berg and Mitte?
see how the social consequences of this compression, in particular with regard to Terms such as gentrification and development? assess how the environmental consequences of these surface sealing? The dense new construction and building density previously developed land in the East Berlin's inner city neighborhoods is due to the price of land and motor development at the same time. It can make big money with intensive land use, because the demand is high.
And you have to use the land intensively as a buyer because the price of land is so high. This is a for profit is high rocking Process until the bubble bursts. With social urban development, urban prudent or healthy living and working conditions, this has nothing to do.
The project seems to me Marthashof less problematic with regard to the density of development on the property, but rather in terms of its integration into the surrounding buildings. Here I do not understand why at the end of the competitive process, a Baufigur come out strongly without any discernible affect the requirement that existing development on the Oder Berger Street and Chestnut Avenue in the quality of living. The argument that it is in Prenzlauer Berg everywhere were such densities in the building, is my opinion no weight. You must create the 21st century not there yet subsequently poor quality housing where land use of the previous hundred years - for whatever reasons or accidents whatsoever - has left more open spaces. comes In a development of the south side of Bernauer Strasse is my opinion mainly on the how. Roadside building development is not in the sense of urban repair exclude mandatory. However, this would be the depth of the land kept free from development and to secure not only a sufficient distance from existing buildings, but the former should plan the "sentry" as a green urban Edge and trail design to be implemented. The further compression of already very dense downtown buildings that moment of "appreciation" in particular in the districts Mitte, Prenzlauer Berg and Friedrichshain. This took and takes place in marked edigenartiger, a process of urban social change for the term gentrification was.
However, there was here in the East Berlin neighborhoods also some not insignificant features. Here the structural substance was indeed run down, but the residents in your social composition was mixed. It had occurred because of social conditions in the GDR, no social segregation. Because of this socially mixed population structure, which is also reproduced in the first years after the collapse of the GDR nor were the areas of interest to private capital investment in the renovation of old buildings and their extension (loft conversion and new construction). This process has been pushed by public support and accelerated and drove with the private investment and the rents and condo share in the air. On the line was the social mix of residential neighborhoods. Average of 85 to 90% of today's residents have moved in the last 15 years in these districts. Low-income Tenant was forced out or no longer able to move into the area, unless they can rent one of the bound support rate apartments.
evaluation and results can be incorporated into planning Conclusion: gentrification and building density are
two
sides of the same coin, and the appreciation of property price increase.
The environmental drawbacks of this development are obvious:
higher density means more sealing and less green on private land in the block interior areas the consequences for the urban climate. Added to this is that, relative by growing number of residents in a small space and the traffic impact of private and commercial traffic to this area increases.is particularly counter-productive from the environmental point of view the objective of building on small areas of the former railway land to the north runway, because this area for the ventilation of the inner city, for the supply of cold and fresh air from the north is very important. ----------------------------------------------- ----------------------
third Kamburoglu Ali, an independent candidate
Dear Mr Schleicher,
thank you for your inquiry, the I comment as follows:
first I support the initiatives of the citizens' movement against the development plans of the District for Construction of the center and the company Viveco Real Estate. I have chosen as a candidate for direct election to the Bundestag, to offer including the privatization madness stop, which ultimately leads to the redistribution of resources from bottom to top. Luxury villas in the Wall Park is the wrong entry to counter the impoverishment of broad sections of society.
second Generally I take the view that urban development in the first place the public good must come. Further urban consolidation is contrary to this goal, since it only improves the living conditions for higher incomes. With the specific construction projects you mentioned I was working yet, so I can explain to you right now only my basic opinion.
demand in my manifesto I have more to do with poverty and unemployment. I went to the election with the statement: Our children are our future. In this future we must invest. Yuppies in residential areas that were previously occupied by more vulnerable populations, exacerbate the contradictions, without bringing a contribution to the solution. Instead of a supposed enhancement of residential areas by redevelopment luxury I ask to use the funds for recreational activities, which all come good. Surface seals that use only single, I reject. If you want to built it so that everyone benefits. Otherwise, the green areas.
third I see in citizens' movements a way to stop the privatization of public property.
- Participation of the population Wedding / Prenzlauer Berg
- town meetings
- surveys of local residents + users
design
+
planning in the sense of those affected!
Sincerely
Ali Kamburoglu
-------- -------------------------------------------------- -----------
4th Dr. Kurt M. Lehner, FDP
Mr Schleicher, angesprochnenen the questions you are local or national political nature, such decisions are taken at the level of the community and possibly the country, but not by the federal government. This applies to the question of expansion of the park wall and the question of privatization, development and enhancement of neighborhoods. I can only say generally that I would consider it desirable, if the wall area would receive a wide area to get this part of German history vividly.
are, however, appeared to land to the real estate developer Vivico been sold. As long as the land not buy Berlin and the district center of Vivico these areas, the only option: You can not expand and millions to pay back, or from regional office center proposedcompromise implement significantly expand the park and wants to spend a peripheral development of Vivico in purchasing. seems Given the economical use of taxpayers' money to me a very careful balancing of interests required. Please direct your question to the Berlin Senate of the SPD and the Left, which is responsible for this situation. Sincerely Dr. Kurt M. Lehner
----------------------------- ----------------------------------------
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)