Marthashof Wall Park Media Spree in the hot autumn
tomorrow is election day in Germany! so hide, we do not, what have
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Bushnell 3200 Elite Tactical Cant Zero
direct Andi data in Berlin-Mitte
used their chance, that of the citizen initiatives network BIN Berlin.org, the initiative fertigstellen.de Wall Park, and the AnliegerInitiatve Marthashof.org compiled questions
(subject was: to answer
PIECE CANDIDATE SURVEY)
, and so explain to the voters even better.
which have taken this trouble, many thanks, - in particular the links that could bring themselves to a joint statement the two candidates of the concerned Write to Mitte and Pankow!
burn the urban policy issues as under the nails that will be at the next election even more Berliners affected: we will remember it because of what was on these issues in September 2009 found no answers.
we want to mention especially Dr. Eva Högl in the SPD. that the companion of Mrs Junge-Reyer, Mr Wowereit, Mr Gothe and Mr. Wieland / Wedding would come with each statement in a considerable dilemma similar predicament is clear: "
si tacuisses, philosophus
for now we are there to remind constantly to and fetch another reminder.
, a word to represent the other major People's Party in Mitte, Dr. Christian Burholt of the CDU: the company car color-stricken, past night by Harald Schmidt intimate as ignorant
family policy details exposed -
wanted to make it, especially as now
some evil-meaning even doubt whether Dr.
Burholt can ever spell gentrifickation
"Pack your things and
it go please," cried the other of the too a good choice
Jörg Schleicher
--------------------------- ------------------------------------------
as a direct candidate in the constituency 076 Berlin-Mitte you is certainly aware that in old center and Wedding, belonging to that constituency, but also in neighboring Prenzlauer Berg, and now also in the whole of Berlin and also discussed the plans of the District for Construction of the center Mr. Ephraim Gothe and Vivico Real Estate for construction of the Wall Park extremely controversial, especially in connection with the construction plans at Bernauer Strasse.
We at the Citizens' Initiatives Network BIN Berlin Wall and the Initiative Park Finish now think that the voters in the district center of your political position should know about this subject, so we allow ourselves to you the following questions:
first have How are the plans for construction of the Wall Park as the center for Construction of the district, Mr Ephraim Gothe and Vivico Real Estate presented in this study plan
neuergothe_plan.jpg and how them on 4 November 2009, Committee on Urban Affairs of the District Assembly of the middle to be presented?
the plan, I never knew before. I'm shocked! I think that you could park in the wall some by planting beautiful. Its recreational value could be increased. It is to become the front yard for the rich but little else. All the opportunities that are REALLY worth and growth for our city to be lost by narrow financial interests cell.
second
How do you want general information about the problem of urban density, as in a particularly crass
How do you want general information about the problem of urban density, as in a particularly crass
(Note: This question is not "open"!)
way for the construction projects Marthashof and chestnut orchards in the Schwedt street, and in the planned nine-story continuous development along the Bernauer Strasse, thus indicates the border between the districts of Prenzlauer Berg and Mitte?
Kastaniengärten Marthashof
marthashofblog: Marthashof-claustrophobia under German roofs
Zoning Process / Senate Department for Urban Development Berlin
Since we have duch the old building of the wall such beautiful open spaces in the city - now they are replaced by new walls.
http://fuer-grundeinkommen.de/ berlin-mitte.htm Jörg Schleicher
see how the social consequences of this compression, in particular with regard to concepts such as gentrification and development?
It is so sad: Hardly a neighborhood is nice, because nice people there have created visionary, he is overwhelmed by financial interests. The Marthashof seems a heinous Concoction to be. To put the residents surrounding these blocks before the doors and windows, I find just a social. A "price increase" the area may take place by - a "revaluation" of the area takes place by any means.
layer: surface sealing!
assess how the environmental consequences of these surface sealing?
layer: surface sealing!
third such problems often go for privatization of public Property ahead: should there be in the decision on privatization of public property, citizens can participate, ABSOLUTELY YES! and how it should be designed, where appropriate? through genuinely free, independently moderated - discussions. S.
http://fuer-grundeinkommen.de/
about answering our questions as soon as possible by e-mail (please also contact @ mauerpark- fertigstellen.de
of the riparian initiative Marthashof for BIN Berlin.org and Wall Park Fertigstellen.de
LG, Ralph
-------------------------------- ------------------------------------- second Dr. Klaus Lederer / Stefan L iebich, common response of the direct candidate for the constituency of 76 (middle) and 77 (Pankow), THE LEFT
Ladies and Gentlemen, Dear residents Initiative Marthashof,
below I am sending you the common response of the direct candidate for the constituency of 76 (middle) and 77 (Pankow), Klaus Lederer and Stefan Liebich.
* 1 * How do you feel about the plans for construction of the Wall Park as the center for Construction of the district, Mr Ephraim Gothe and Vivico Real Estate have presented in this study plan neuergothe_plan.jpg
fertigstellen.de / images /
below I am sending you the common response of the direct candidate for the constituency of 76 (middle) and 77 (Pankow), Klaus Lederer and Stefan Liebich.
http://mauerpark-
fertigstellen.de / images /
neuergothe_plan.jpg
> and how on 4 November 2009, Committee on Urban development of the Borough Assembly center will be presented?
I refuse to the new plans, Mr Gothe with Vivico GmbH for construction of the planned completion for the Wall Park site has agreed, from. Stefan Liebich, direct candidate of the left for the neighboring constituency in the district of Pankow, and I have a statement which I enclose to you, our position, the position of the left Berlin explained. If Gothe and the Berlin city development administration with Vivico want to swap land with building rights, then the municipal action to marketable commodity exchange. The state of Berlin and the districts Middle and Pankow must implement to define the public interest and goals and then those with the appropriate legal means. In this green land use plan as the goal of community is shown. Politicians of all parties had expressed in recent years that you want to make the Wall Park finished. Gothenburg City Council except no one has previously stated that the building would be new residential blocks instead of the Wall Park is a public interest. Gothenburg and the urban management task of the public have to implement the goals or bring about a new policy objective by amending the policy position. The collecting interests of the property owner can not be relevant. Rather than provide housing, should submit a Gothe B-Plan, which identifies the business park as green space.
* 2 * What is your general on the problem of urban density, as in a particularly crass way for the construction projects Marthashof and chestnut orchards in the Schwedt road, as well as the proposed 9-storey continuous development at Bernauer Strasse, thus indicates the border between the districts of Prenzlauer Berg and Mitte?
see how the social consequences of this compression, in particular with regard to Terms such as gentrification and development? assess how the environmental consequences of these surface sealing? The dense new construction and building density previously developed land in the East Berlin's inner city neighborhoods is due to the price of land and motor development at the same time. It can make big money with intensive land use, because the demand is high.
And you have to use the land intensively as a buyer because the price of land is so high. This is a for profit is high rocking Process until the bubble bursts. With social urban development, urban prudent or healthy living and working conditions, this has nothing to do.
The project seems to me Marthashof less problematic with regard to the density of development on the property, but rather in terms of its integration into the surrounding buildings. Here I do not understand why at the end of the competitive process, a Baufigur come out strongly without any discernible affect the requirement that existing development on the Oder Berger Street and Chestnut Avenue in the quality of living. The argument that it is in Prenzlauer Berg everywhere were such densities in the building, is my opinion no weight. You must create the 21st century not there yet subsequently poor quality housing where land use of the previous hundred years - for whatever reasons or accidents whatsoever - has left more open spaces. comes In a development of the south side of Bernauer Strasse is my opinion mainly on the how. Roadside building development is not in the sense of urban repair exclude mandatory. However, this would be the depth of the land kept free from development and to secure not only a sufficient distance from existing buildings, but the former should plan the "sentry" as a green urban Edge and trail design to be implemented. The further compression of already very dense downtown buildings that moment of "appreciation" in particular in the districts Mitte, Prenzlauer Berg and Friedrichshain. This took and takes place in marked edigenartiger, a process of urban social change for the term gentrification was.
However, there was here in the East Berlin neighborhoods also some not insignificant features. Here the structural substance was indeed run down, but the residents in your social composition was mixed. It had occurred because of social conditions in the GDR, no social segregation. Because of this socially mixed population structure, which is also reproduced in the first years after the collapse of the GDR nor were the areas of interest to private capital investment in the renovation of old buildings and their extension (loft conversion and new construction). This process has been pushed by public support and accelerated and drove with the private investment and the rents and condo share in the air. On the line was the social mix of residential neighborhoods. Average of 85 to 90% of today's residents have moved in the last 15 years in these districts. Low-income Tenant was forced out or no longer able to move into the area, unless they can rent one of the bound support rate apartments.
evaluation and results can be incorporated into planning Conclusion: gentrification and building density are
two
sides of the same coin, and the appreciation of property price increase.
The environmental drawbacks of this development are obvious:
higher density means more sealing and less green on private land in the block interior areas the consequences for the urban climate. Added to this is that, relative by growing number of residents in a small space and the traffic impact of private and commercial traffic to this area increases.is particularly counter-productive from the environmental point of view the objective of building on small areas of the former railway land to the north runway, because this area for the ventilation of the inner city, for the supply of cold and fresh air from the north is very important. ----------------------------------------------- ----------------------
third Kamburoglu Ali, an independent candidate
Dear Mr Schleicher,
thank you for your inquiry, the I comment as follows:
first I support the initiatives of the citizens' movement against the development plans of the District for Construction of the center and the company Viveco Real Estate. I have chosen as a candidate for direct election to the Bundestag, to offer including the privatization madness stop, which ultimately leads to the redistribution of resources from bottom to top. Luxury villas in the Wall Park is the wrong entry to counter the impoverishment of broad sections of society.
second Generally I take the view that urban development in the first place the public good must come. Further urban consolidation is contrary to this goal, since it only improves the living conditions for higher incomes. With the specific construction projects you mentioned I was working yet, so I can explain to you right now only my basic opinion.
demand in my manifesto I have more to do with poverty and unemployment. I went to the election with the statement: Our children are our future. In this future we must invest. Yuppies in residential areas that were previously occupied by more vulnerable populations, exacerbate the contradictions, without bringing a contribution to the solution. Instead of a supposed enhancement of residential areas by redevelopment luxury I ask to use the funds for recreational activities, which all come good. Surface seals that use only single, I reject. If you want to built it so that everyone benefits. Otherwise, the green areas.
third I see in citizens' movements a way to stop the privatization of public property.
- Participation of the population Wedding / Prenzlauer Berg
- town meetings
- surveys of local residents + users
design
+
planning in the sense of those affected!
Sincerely
Ali Kamburoglu
-------- -------------------------------------------------- -----------
4th Dr. Kurt M. Lehner, FDP
Mr Schleicher, angesprochnenen the questions you are local or national political nature, such decisions are taken at the level of the community and possibly the country, but not by the federal government. This applies to the question of expansion of the park wall and the question of privatization, development and enhancement of neighborhoods. I can only say generally that I would consider it desirable, if the wall area would receive a wide area to get this part of German history vividly.
are, however, appeared to land to the real estate developer Vivico been sold. As long as the land not buy Berlin and the district center of Vivico these areas, the only option: You can not expand and millions to pay back, or from regional office center proposedcompromise implement significantly expand the park and wants to spend a peripheral development of Vivico in purchasing. seems Given the economical use of taxpayers' money to me a very careful balancing of interests required. Please direct your question to the Berlin Senate of the SPD and the Left, which is responsible for this situation. Sincerely Dr. Kurt M. Lehner
----------------------------- ----------------------------------------
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment